HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning)

Wednesday, August 30, 2006






Inline fans

I recently specified belt-driven inline fans on a job. The good thing I found out about Greenheck's BSQ line of fans is that the fans can be rotated in any manner i.e., the motor does not necessarily have to be on top, it can be on either side, it can even be upside down. This is a useful feature because often times you have limited vertical clearance to install these fans. Charles Lauer of Norman S. Wright Company (representing Greenheck) told me fans with motors up to 5 HP can be rotated in any manner.
[Photo courtesy of Greenheck.]

Monday, August 21, 2006


Building occupancy classifications simplified

Still confused about occupancy classifications? Let me simplify things for you. In Uniform Mechanical Code the building occupancies are designated by letters. Here is my explanation of each occupancy group.

Group A occupancy
A is for assembly
Churches, arenas, stadiums, concert halls, etc.

Group B
Offices and eating and drinking establishments with an occupant load of less than fifty.

Group C
Not used

Group D
Not used

Group E
E is for Education
Sschools and day care for more than 6 persons.

Group F
F is for factory

Group H
H is for hazardous

Group I
I is for institution
Nurseries, Hospitals, Mental hospitals, jails, reformatories, etc.

Group M
M is for merchandise
Shops

Group R
R is for residence
Hotels, apartment houses, dwellings, and lodging houses.

Group S
S is for storage (non-hazardous material)
Storage building, parking garages, aircraft hangers.

Group U
U is for normally unoccupied spaces
Private garages, carports, sheds, and agricultural buildings.

So you live in a house (Group R); in the morning you drop your children at a school or day care (Group E); then you go to your office (Group B); midday you go to eat lunch at a restaurant (Group B); and in the evening you go for grocery shopping (Group M). On Sundays you go to a church (Group A), and if you get sick you go to a hospital (Group I).

Tuesday, August 15, 2006


Determining feasibility of a District Cooling and Heating system

A district energy system gets an edge over individual central plans in utilizing the diversity of load on a big campus. Instead of sizing individual units at peak load you size the district energy equipment for the combined peak load of the facility. This lends very well to large facilities where demands vary at different places at different times of the day. College campuses where learning centers are mainly buys during day and residence facilities are mainly occupied at night provide perfect match for district heating and cooling application. Similarly a combination of office and residential buildings in a planned community is also a good candidate for district cooling and heating.

[Places where on-site power generation is being considered a combined power and heating-cooling plant (district cooling) is a logical choice.]

Besides utilizing the diversity of loads the other obvious advantage in centralization of cooling-heating plant is in reduced maintenance costs.

The facilities that are ideal for district cooling applications are where
i) the diversity in load is very high;
ii) the buildings are not too distant from each other (reducing the cost of distribution); and
iii) hiring service and maintenance personnel is very expensive.

All three of the above factors vary greatly with each facility. Thus there is a need to compare the cost of individual units with the cost of centralized plant for each potential district cooling-heating candidate. This seemingly complex task can be simplified by using approximate figures for:
i) cost/ton of cooling equipment,
ii) cost/ft of distribution system, and
iii) annual salary of maintenance personnel.

For cases where the cost differential between individual units and district cooling-heating unit is rather close, a more detailed analysis can be undertaken.

[Photo source: Hiroshima Gas Company]